Default Inferences From Statistical Knowledge

نویسنده

  • Fahiem Bacchus
چکیده

There are two common and distinct uses of probabilities: probabilities used as degrees of belief and probabilities used as statistical measures. Probabilities used as statistical measures can represent various assertions about the objective statistical state of the world, while probabilities used as degrees of belief can represent various assertions about the subjective state of an agent’s beliefs. In this paper we examine how an agent who knows certain statistical facts about the world might infer certain probabilistic degrees of beliefs in other assertions based on these statistics. For example, an agent who knows that most birds fly (a statistical fact) may have a degree of belief greater than 0.5 in the assertion that Tweety flies given that Tweety is a bird. This inference of degrees of belief from statistical facts is know as direct inference. We develop a formal logical mechanism for performing direct inference, and demonstrate how this mechanism can be applied to the problem of making default inferences as studied in AI.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Statistical Inference as Default Reasoning

Classical statistical inference isnonmonotonic in nature. We show how it can be form~ized inthe default logic framework. Thestructure of statistical inference is the same as that represented by default rules. In particular, theprerequisite corresponds to the sample statistics, the justifications require that we do not have any reason to believe that the sample is misleading, and the consequent ...

متن کامل

Location Reparameterization and Default Priors for Statistical Analysis

This paper develops default priors for Bayesian analysis that reproduce familiar frequentist and Bayesian analyses for models that are exponential or location. For the vector parameter case there is an information adjustment that avoids the Bayesian marginalization paradoxes and properly targets the prior on the parameter of interest thus adjusting for any complicating nonlinearity the details ...

متن کامل

Default Reasoning From Statistics

There are two common but quite distinct interpretations of probabilities: they can be interpreted as a measure of the extent to which an agent believes an assertion, i.e., as an agent’s degree of belief, or they can be interpreted as an assertion of relative frequency, i.e., as a statistical measure. Used as statistical measures probabilities can represent various assertions about the objective...

متن کامل

Explaining default intuitions using maximum entropy

While research into default reasoning is extensive and many default intuitions are commonly held, no one system has yet captured all these intuitions nor given a formal account to motivate them. This paper argues that the extended maximum entropy approach which incorporates variable strength defaults provides a benchmark for default reasoning that is not only objectively motivated but also sati...

متن کامل

Default Logics for Plausible Reasoning with Controversial Axioms

Using a variant of Lehmann's Default Logics and Probabilistic Description Logics we recently presented a framework that invalidates those unwanted inferences that cause concept unsatisfiability without the need to remove explicitly stated axioms. The solutions of this methods were shown to outperform classical ontology repair w.r.t. the number of inferences invalidated. However, conflicts may s...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1991